The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Research shows: Sustainable development requires locally rooted aid

Portrait image of Billy Jones in a green surrounding. Photo
Billy Jones explored in his thesis why aid projects in northern Kenya often fail and how local knowledge can contribute to more sustainable development for pastoralists.

For hundreds of years, people have made a living from livestock herding in rural Kenya. Today, their traditional way of life is increasingly burdened by the effects of climate change and population growth. In his doctoral thesis, Billy Jones examines why development aid projects in the region often fail – and how sustainable progress could instead be achieved with the help of local actors.

Thirteen  years ago, Billy Jones moved from United Kingdom  to Baringo in northern Kenya. He spent four years there and observed how Western NGOs operated locally, implementing various projects aimed at lifting people out of poverty.

Many of the local residents are pastoralists, meaning they depend on animal husbandry, often in harsh and unforgiving environments. In recent years, their way of life has become significantly more difficult. Climate change brings severe droughts, coupled with floods and other weather events that disrupt growing seasons and access to pasture. Combined with a growing population and the pressures of modernisation – including a market economy where people must earn money to pay for schooling and healthcare – life has become increasingly challenging.

This is where development organisations come in. According to Billy Jones, Baringo has become something of a test bed for aid initiatives. Although these projects are well-intentioned, the outcomes are often disappointing. Billy Jones witnessed many of them fail; sometimes being repeated several times despite previous setbacks.

A reversed perspective is needed

‘I wondered why there wasn’t more effort to listen to the local people, and that question stayed with me into my doctoral research. I wanted to understand how these organisations operate and how we might reverse the perspective – working from the bottom up, based on the needs of the people on the ground,’ says Billy Jones.

That question became the focus of his doctoral studies at the Division of Ethnology and the university’s interdisciplinary Agenda 2030 Graduate School. Initially, the plan was for Billy Jones to return to Baringo for extensive fieldwork. But on the very day his fieldwork was approved by the university, the Covid-19 pandemic hit and all plans were derailed.

Instead of shifting his research direction, Billy Jones found a creative solution. He began collaborating with a grassroots organisation and trained two local pastoralists in filming and interview techniques. They became his voice, eyes and ears in the field – and brought with them the local knowledge and networks needed to navigate the area.

Through recorded interviews and phone calls, the fieldwork progressed with Billy Jones working remotely from his desk in Malmö. In total, 36 people – both NGO staff and pastoralists – were interviewed in Baringo.

The back of a man with a film camera in green surroundings. Photo
Due to Covid-19, Billy Jones collaborated with Osman and Joseph in Baringo, Kenya, to carry out fieldwork. Here, Osman Oleparmarin is filming invasive tree species that, according to a livestock herder, were also damaging his goats’ teeth. Photo: Dan Besley

From a grassroots perspective

‘In many ways, the outcome was actually better than if I’d done it myself. My collaborators were able to ask questions from a real grassroots perspective, and we avoided the postcolonial dynamics that would have been harder to manage with me as the interviewer.’

As the pandemic subsided, Billy Jones was eventually able to spend a few weeks in Kenya. However, he deliberately kept a low profile during the interviews for the same reasons.

What, then, were the key findings of his research? Billy Jones summarises them:

  • For a very long time, pastoralists have lived within a predictable system tied to seasonal cycles. But now the conditions have changed. The weather is erratic, and they are hit hard by both drought and flooding. Planning and organising life as before is no longer possible. On top of that comes the pressure of the market economy – the need to generate income in an economically driven society.
  • These new conditions demand adaptation. And people are adapting – developing a range of strategies to cope with the changing situation, such as farming grass intensively for fodder and selling livestock through local markets to earn money. But in most cases, it’s about surviving rather than thriving.
  • Development projects can succeed – but only if we abandon the standard model of 3–4 year project cycles and invest in long-term infrastructure. Ideas must be rooted in and tailored to local contexts. We need to listen to local communities and build structures together that continue to evolve year after year.

Despite the widespread poverty and the failure of many projects, there were also bright spots. One example was grass cultivation. Several pastoralists interviewed confirmed that their own initiative to sow a mix of indigenous grass varieties was a turning point. The grass withstood droughts and floods better; animals got enough to eat; and some people made a living by buying underweight animals, feeding them well, and selling them on at higher value. They also began selling grass seed and hay – opening up new income opportunities, particularly for women. These results are documented in Billy Jones’ research.

Now, with a successful PhD defence behind him, Billy Jones teaches at Lund University while applying for postdoctoral positions, with hopes of staying in Malmö with his family.

‘I would like to understand more about why NGOs are so locked into rigid structures, and how global narratives shape their actions. I’d love to research the process from idea to implementation – and try to identify alternative approaches,’ he says.

Read more about Billy Jones
Read the thesis Resilient Pastoralism: A Cultural Analysis of Navigating Climate Change, Modernity and the Development Industry in Northern Kenya - Lund University Research Portal

 

Pastoralism

Pastoralism is a traditional way of life centred on livestock herding, often practised in environmentally challenging areas. There are around 200 million pastoralists globally – from the savannas of Africa to the tundra of the Arctic. Common forms include nomadism, transhumance, and agropastoralism. Pastoralists adapt to seasonal changes by moving their animals to where grazing is available. They often live in marginalised regions, with limited access to healthcare, education, and political representation. Climate change, land loss, and conflict threaten their livelihoods.

'Flooding and drought'

An excerpt from Billy Jones’s thesis illustrates the lived realities of pastoralists in Baringo amid overlapping environmental and socio-economic crises.

'Deadcattle lining the road. Invasive species destroying entire ecosystems. Flooding and drought. Cattle rustling and displacement. It’s been a heavy day. This chapter has taken us on a road trip around the Baringo Basin to give a snapshot of the challenging environment in which pastoralists conduct their lives and attempt to make a living. It has explored how pastoralists are impacted by and cope with the multiple, overlapping crises that shape their lives. For the majority, the place they call home is now experienced as a number of overlapping marginal spaces. Forced to navigate the entangled system of economic, judicial and ecological challenges emerging out of the crises, daily life for many in Baringo is now defined by absence, disturbance and violence.’